Thursday, November 11, 2010

The Ethical Dilemma on Jesse Shipley's Case

If you are a parent and your child suddenly died of an accident, what would you feel? Of course you will be very lonely, right? But what will you do if your child died and two months after his funeral you received news from a friend of your late child saying that she had seen the brain of your child displayed in a morgue? Whoa! Horrified? Angry? Shocked?
The case of Jesse Shipley had attracted attention on the web lately. He was 17 years old and was a student of Staten Island, New York. He died in a car accident last January 2005. He was autopsied and his body was brought back to his parents, which is a misconception since one of his classmates in the said school that he attended saw his brain on a cabinet in the medical examiner's lab. Thus, there are still remains of his body that were not yet given to his parents. And his parents were shocked for they had thought that the body of their child was complete when it was brought back to them. After all who will be the parents that will be happy after finding out that part of their child’s body was taken without their permission?


The College of American Pathologists provides a sample autopsy consent form on its website. According to the form, the consenter authorizes "the removal, examination, and retention of organs....as the pathologists deem proper for diagnostic, education, quality improvement and research purposes." However, the form also states that "organs and tissues not needed for diagnostic, education, quality improvement, or research purposes will be sent to the funeral home or disposed of appropriately."
Is it really proper to take the brain of the young Shipley? Was his brain sent to the funeral? Or to his parents?
In a statement to CNN, the attorney representing the city wrote that although officials sympathize with the family, "it was within the Medical Examiner's discretion to perform an autopsy, and in appropriate cases, to remove and retain bodily organs for further testing."
Jesse Shipley died in an accident. What further testing and study was needed to know the cause of his death?
"To say someone died of a motor vehicle accident, doesn't really tell us anything," Dr. Victor Weedn, a forensic pathologist and a spokesperson for the National Association of Medical Examiners explains. "For example, if a passenger in the backseat was epileptic, their fit could have distracted the driver and led to the death. So, from the outside it may not be so obvious why the person actually died."
Dr. Cyril H. Wecht, a forensic pathologist and attorney who reviews cases like these but is not involved in the Shipley case, says the medical examiner was right to take out the brain for investigation but was wrong to openly display Shipley's name on it."You're talking about a matter of sensitivity and common sense," Wecht says. "Certainly if you're going to have student visitors, then you should not have names and numbers available to see."
Did the family of Jesse Shipley has right to sue the medical examiner who without their permission get the brain of their child?
Ethically speaking these medical examiners in medical scrubs and cargo pants for men or women have the right but did they do everything with due process of law? Did the medical examiners consider what will the family of the deceased will gonna feel? Certainly they weren't aware that "whenever the parent's remember their child, part of their memory is holding a jar of organs in their hands that they never should have known existed."

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Budget for Emergency Room Services at Vancouver Hospitals

VANCOUVER - Fifteen major hospitals across B.C. are getting a total of $22 million to fast-track patients through their emergency rooms as part of the government's strategy to tie funding to hospital performance.

Health Services Minister Kevin Falcon said Wednesday the money follows a pilot project that helped reduce congestion in emergency rooms at several hospitals in Metro Vancouver and the Fraser Valley.






"With almost two million visits to B.C. emergency rooms last year alone, this investment will help ensure patients receive timely, high-quality patient care," Falcon said in a news release.

The hospitals sharing the cash include seven in the Vancouver area and others in Victoria, Nanaimo, Kelowna, Kamloops, Vernon and Prince George.



Thursday, September 30, 2010

Caregiver Alert: Sleep Positioners of Babies Can Cause Death

“We urge parents and caregivers to take our warning seriously and stop using these sleep positioners, so that children can have a safer sleep.”
CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum



The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned consumers to stop using infant sleep positioners. Over the past 13 years, CPSC and the FDA have received 12 reports of infants between the ages of 1 month and 4 months who died when they suffocated in sleep positioners or became trapped and suffocated between a sleep positioner and the side of a crib or bassinet.


Most of the infants suffocated after rolling from a side to stomach position. In addition to the reported deaths, CPSC has received dozens of reports of infants who were placed on their backs or sides in sleep positioners, only to be found later in potentially hazardous positions within or next to the sleep positioners.


“To date, there is no scientifically sound evidence that infant sleep positioners prevent SIDS,” said Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner and a pediatrician. “We want to make sure parents, health care professionals, and childcare providers understand the potential risk of suffocation and stop using infant sleep positioners.”


There are two main types of infant sleep positioners. The flat mats with side bolsters or inclined (wedge) mats with side bolsters. Both typically claim to help keep infants on their backs and reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). The FDA has never cleared an infant sleep positioner to prevent or reduce the risk of SIDS. In addition, CPSC and the FDA are unaware of any scientific studies demonstrating that infant positioners prevent SIDS or are proven to prevent suffocation or other life-threatening harm. And even the American Academy of Pediatrics does not support the use of any sleep positioner to prevent SIDS.





However these sleep positioners claim to have the following advantages:
  • Aid in food digestion to ease colic or the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
  • Prevent flat head syndrome (plagiocephaly)

These benefits on the other hand didn't outweighs the risk of sleep positioners that's why CPSC and the FDA are warning parents and people in hospital scrubs or cartoon scrubs (the caregivers) to:
  • STOP using sleep positioners. Using a positioner to hold an infant on his or her back or side for sleep is dangerous and unnecessary.
  • NEVER put pillows, infant sleep positioners, comforters, or quilts under a baby or in a crib.
  • ALWAYS place an infant on his or her back at night and during nap time. To reduce the risk of SIDS, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends placing infants to sleep on their backs and not their sides.
Read more: Deaths prompt CPSC, FDA warning on infant sleep positioners

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Is Hospital a Safe Place to Go?

"Once considered safe havens, health care institutions today are confronting steadily increasing rates of crime, including violent crime."
Joint Commission


Since 2004, the number of assaults, rapes and murders reported to the Joint Commission rose steadily, with the greatest number of reports in the last three years. There were 36 incidents nationwide in 2007, 41 in 2008 and 33 in 2009. According to the Joint Commission’s voluntary reporting system, there were 256 assaults, rapes or homicides of patients and visitors at American health centers since 1995, with 110 of those acts occurring after 2007. That number is likely far lower than the actual number of incidents because violence in health settings is often underreported, the group said.


They further said that violence is often perpetrated by staff, visitors, patients and even intruders. What happened on Baltimore hospital wherein the gunman Warren Davis,who reportedly hid inside his mother's room, shot and killed himself and his mother is a perfect example of how violence is growing INSIDE the hospital. I'm talking here all the kinds of violence that were committed; assaults, rapes, homicides and many more.


Hospitals are supposedly one of the institutions and places wherein one could be at peace since healing and cure are happening here. This is where ill and sick people take refuge. However with this growing violence even inside the hospital, the hospital could pose a great threat for patients and even to the men and women in medical scrubs and nursing shoes who are working there. This event will eventually affect the medical world itself.


The proper authorities must make a move before it is too late. Where in the world would people who are sick and ill go if there are no institutions like hospitals? Or where could we find a peaceful place here on earth? Whew!

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Superbug will soon attack Hospitals?!

People in scrubs uniforms are alert nowadays because of the widespread news regarding NDM-1 or commonly known as the new "superbug".



NDM-1 bacteria is a newly-identified superbug that is spreading globally. The NDM-1 stands for “New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase” or New Delhi-Metallo-1 (NDM-1) named after the capital city of India, where it was first identified.NDM-1 gene has been found inside the E. Coli bacteria and Klebsiella pneumonia. This superbug is antibiotic-resistant and has the potential to become more devastating than the H1N1 Pandemic because it makes bacteria extremely resistant to almost all antibiotics, including the most potent class called carbapenems, the kind of drug that is reserved for emergency use and treat infections caused by other multi-resistant bugs like MRSA and C-Difficile. However there are still two drugs that can stand up to carbapenem-resistant infections. These are colistin, an older antibiotic that has some toxic side effects, and Pfizer's Tygacil.




What caused NDM-1?


This superbug is said to be caused by the medical tourism especially those who have undergone cosmetic surgeries and international travel especially those who received recent medical care in India. And since this bacteria was spread by travel it has the possibility to spread very quickly not just in India, Pakistan and UK but even around the world.



What are its effects/symptoms?


The NDM-1 enzyme can lead to pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and blood infections. Health officials have revealed that the NDM-1 Bacteria can spread in person-to-person contact. E. Coli symptoms are diarrhea,abdominal cramps,nausea, and fatigue while Klebsiella pneumonia's symptoms are fever, chills, cough, dizziness, wheezing and urinary tract infection (UTI)



Who have high risk of being infected?


Those people who have recently been to India or Pakistan, those who have been in contact with someone who has recently traveled to India or Pakistan and those who have weakened immune systems.



What must be done?


The most effective way to get rid of this superbug is to make new kind of antibiotics that could cure NHM-1 infected patients however most drug companies have little interest in developing new antibiotics because they are not as profitable as other drugs, they are only taken for a few days, unlike drugs for high blood pressure, pain or cholesterol which are taken for long periods.So as for now we will settle for the answer that this superbug is not that curable by ordinary antibiotics. What we could only do is to prevent infection by avoiding those people who have high risk of being infected. Let's just settle for this however by any case that this bacteria will be widespread this could be another problem for the society, government, hospitals and the world itself.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

From Being a Patient to Being a Doctor...


This is a story of a woman who faced her past without regrets and her future with determination.

'After all that I've been through, I think I can use the experiences I've had with both good and bad doctors to help others.'

In a young life blighted by serious illnesses, Allison John has unwillingly made medical history by becoming the first person in Britain to have all her major organs transplanted.


Her health problems date from infancy, when she was diagnosed with cystic fibrosis at six weeks old. The incurable genetic condition causes the lungs to clog up with mucus and sufferers are unable to absorb fats and other nutrients from food. At the age of 14 her liver began to fail and she was told she would need a transplant. An agonising 16-month wait for a match followed before the transplant was carried out in September 1995.


It was only during surgery that doctors realised how ill she was, with as little as three days to live without a transplant. She had originally been offered a donor liver four months earlier - but had generously given it to another patient. By then, her education had been affected to such an extent that she failed to get the A-level grades needed to start a medical degree, so she opted to study neuroscience at Cardiff instead. Six months after enrolling in 1996, however, she was told she was suffering from lung failure.


A match was found in August 1997 and Miss John was given four hours to get from her family home in Fishguard, Pembrokeshire, to Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, where the new heart and lungs - they are replaced together as a package - were waiting. She made it with only minutes to spare after the ambulance got lost.


She then enjoyed good health for several years and completed her neuroscience degree in 2001, graduating with a 2:1, enough to get her into the university's College of Medicine the following October. But in April 2005 came another devastating blow: The medication she was taking to stop her body rejecting the transplanted organs had caused renal failure and she would need a new kidney. Her father David, 61, was found to be a match and the operation was carried out in December 2006. On her epidural she remained fully conscious, feeling the doctors 'tugging and pulling but no pain'.


She received a new liver, kidney, heart and lungs in a series of difficult operations spanning 12 years to tackle the major health problems that at one stage left her just three days from death.


Miss John, who lives in Cardiff with her fiance Nathan Angell, 30, graduated from Cardiff University last month. She is now about to start work as a junior doctor at Neville Hall Hospital in Abergavenny, 30 miles away. Ever since she was a schoolgirl she had wanted to be a physician in medical uniforms. Today she has finally fulfilled the dream after graduating from medical college.


Friday, August 6, 2010

Hospital Food Goes Green


This may not be a news anymore because this happened last September 2009 but this is worth noting for. There is a program called Balance Menus which is a voluntary program that seeks to improve nutrition and benefit the environment by reducing meat purchasing among participating hospitals by 20 percent within 12 months. The program also promotes shifting towards serving more sustainably produced meat.

Developed and piloted by San Francisco Physicians for Social Responsibility, Balanced Menus
was first implemented in 2008 in four San Francisco Bay Area hospitals. In September 2009,
Health Care Without Harm launched the program nationally.

This program was implemented in four San Francisco Bay Area hospitals: Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, the San Francisco VA Medical Center, the John Muir Health Medical Center, and one anonymous hospital. The hospitals vary in size as well as medical and food services provided, representing a broad range of possibilities for the program.

So what is the result of this program. Did the healthcare personnel,patients,doctors and nurses in medical uniforms grew thinner and unhealthier at the span of this program. Definitely not.

The Balanced Menus program implementation in these four hospitals exceeded the 20 percent meat reduction goal, and yielded substantial savings in costs and greenhouse gas emissions, as well as, potentially,some improvements in health for those eating reduced quantities of meat. The program’s expansion provides an important opportunity to further advance these goals. With a larger sample of hospitals and a longer time-span, future program evaluation work can gain an even clearer perspective on the program’s impacts.

This is actually a great news! If only all hospitals would do this, then even patients will be healthier and doctors too!

Monday, July 26, 2010

Are Medical Scrubs that Essential?

Man looks at the outside appearance but God looks at the heart....



There are times that I wonder if janitors, teachers, pilots, physicians and nurses really need uniforms. We often see them in their uniforms and we implied and know for an instance who they are and what are their jobs through their clothes and dress. However did it occur to our mind if their uniforms are the criteria for a better service?


Yesterday I went to the hospital and I happened to noticed that all the nursing staffs and medical personnel there are wearing hospital uniforms and nursing uniforms. Then suddenly I wonder if there is really a need for them to wear their uniforms. Whew! (Just reflecting things out there..hmm..hmm..)


There are actually so many nursing forums who are always debating for what is the appropriate dress code for nurses; choosing between the white nursing uniforms and the solid medical scrubs and print scrubs.

Is there really a need for them to debate over their appearance instead of giving themselves into service with patients? As for me I'm not after the form of these nurses who wear Cherokee scrub tops or Dickies scrub tops, or even these doctors in Meta Uniforms, White Swan Fundamental Scrubs or even in white lab coats. All that matters to me is the spirit of service they are giving to their patients and on how dedicated they are to people. Hospitals and health care need nurses and physicians who are not vain about how they look but these institutions need someone who have the heart to serve and heal those sick.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Dental Care is Limited to Children





Nearly 25% of children in California have never been to the dentist and that disparities exist across race, ethnicity, and type of insurance when it comes to the length of time between dental care visits.


Researchers found that Latino and African American children across all types of insurance were less likely than Asian American and white children to have visited the dentist in the prior six months. Similarly, Latino and African American children in public insurance programs, including Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), went to the dentist less often than white and Asian American children with the same insurance coverage.


The researchers note the findings raise concerns about Medicaid's ability to address disparities in dental care access. Ultimately, they observe, more strategic efforts are necessary to overcome systemic barriers to care, including raising reimbursement rates paid to dentists who serve the Medicaid population and increasing the number of participating Medicaid providers.


And despite the disparities, having any form of dental insurance significantly increases the odds of seeing a dentist on a regular basis — 54% of privately insured children and 27% of publicly insured children had seen the dentist in the last six months, compared to 12% of children without dental coverage.


According to this study the ratio of these children who regularly go to dentists to those who don't is 1:4 Californian children. What will eventually happen to these kids who didn't even met men and women in dental uniforms and medical scrubs? Regular dental check-up is a necessity especially to children and kids for they are more prone to eating sweet and sugary foods and sometimes forgetting to brush too. Whew! Anyway may this study help a lot and awaken parents and even the authorities that are involved taking the fact that 80% of dentists refuse Medicaid patients and 130 million Americans don't have dental insurance. Great :(


Read more: Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Dental Care For Publicly Insured Children